The
first half of the nineteenth century witnessed the gradual emergence of a
conflict between religion and science as the latter attempted to explain and
explore worldly phenomena. In 1859, with the publication of Charles Darwin’s The Origin of Species, this clash
eructed into a vicious battle as Darwin and his fellow biologists and
geologists contended with theologians and staunch religious congregations over
evolution and creationism.[1] From Samuel Wilberforce’s scathing review of
Darwin’s theories to Edgar Allan Poe’s lamentations in “Sonnet – To Science”
that science will eradicate human imagination, popular figures and the common man
joined the heated conversation consuming the era.[2] Although Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein was published over four
decades before Darwin’s work and the controversy it ignited, many have
clustered it into the debate due to its strong themes regarding the limitations
of science; however, as some literary scholars maintain, the exploration into
scientific man’s attempts to play God (a central issue present in even the most
casual adaptations) is just one of the many factors addressed by the timeless
novel.[3] Indeed, the narrative, particularly the relationship between Dr.
Victor Frankenstein and his creation, also comments on childbirth and
parenthood, the frustrations of the creative process, and the responsibilities
of the artist to both his artwork and the society in which he displays it.[4]
Works
Referenced
Darwin,
Charles. On the Origin of Species. 1859. New York: Dover Publications, 2006.
Poe,
Edgar Allan. “Sonnet – To Science.” The Complete Tales and Poems of Edgar Allan Poe. New York: Barnes and Nobles, 1992. 28.
Shelley,
Mary. Frankenstein. 1818. New York: Dover Publications, 1994.
Wilberforce,
Samuel. “Review of On the Origin of Species.” Quarterly Review (1860): 225-264.
Zimmer, Carl. Evolution: The Triumph of an Idea. New York: HarperCollins, 2001.
____________________
[1] Zimmer, 32-67.
[2]
Davis, Harrison, Johnson, Smith, and Crawford, 382-383.
[3]
Davis, Harrison, Johnson, Smith, and Crawford, 383.
[4]
Davis, Harrison, Johnson, Smith, and Crawford, 383.
No comments:
Post a Comment